İletişim
Bizi takip edin:
İletişime Geçin
Kapat

İletişim

Türkiye İstanbul

info@thinkpeak.ai

Make.com Data Store vs Google Sheets: Which to Use?

3D mint-green database stack with an arrow pointing to a spreadsheet file icon, illustrating transferring data from Make.com Data Store to Google Sheets

Make.com Data Store vs Google Sheets: Which to Use?

Make.com Data Store vs Google Sheets: The Architecture of Autonomous Systems

It is 2:00 AM. Your automation scenario has stopped running. You aren’t awake to see it, but the logs paint a bright red picture of failure. It isn’t a logic bug or a server crash. It is the dreaded 429: Too Many Requests error.

Your “database” just ghosted you.

For years, the debate between Make.com Data Stores and Google Sheets has been framed as a matter of preference. One offers a familiar spreadsheet interface; the other offers a native, invisible backend. But in the automation landscape of 2026, this is no longer a question of preference. It is a question of physics.

When you build simple linear workflows, Google Sheets is a comfortable notebook. But when you deploy Autonomous AI Agents capable of reasoning and executing thousands of decisions per hour, Sheets becomes a bottleneck. It can strangle your entire operation. Conversely, the Make.com Data Store is a high-speed engine that runs silently but lacks the human touch.

This article provides a technical comparison of these two data architectures. We will dissect their rate limits, latency benchmarks, and cost structures. We aim to help you decide whether your business needs a spreadsheet, a native store, or a bespoke engineering solution.


The “Comfort Trap”: Why Google Sheets Fails at Scale

Google Sheets is the gateway drug of automation. It is free, accessible, and visual. For most businesses starting their automation journey, it is the default database. You can see your data, color-code it, and share it with your team. However, this “human-friendliness” is exactly what makes it hostile to high-performance bots.

The Hidden Ceiling: API Rate Limits

The most critical limitation of Google Sheets in an automated environment is the API quota. Despite infrastructure upgrades, the core limitations of the Google Sheets API remain a hard wall for developers.

  • The Project Limit: 300 requests per minute per project.
  • The User Limit: 60 requests per minute per user.

This sounds generous until you do the math. Imagine a workflow that scrapes a prospect, enriches the data, generates an icebreaker, and updates a row. That single lead might consume 3 to 4 separate “Write” operations.

If your scenario processes just 20 leads concurrently, you hit 80 requests per minute. You immediately crash into the per-user limit. The API returns a 429: Too Many Requests error, and your scenario pauses. In a high-volume sales environment, this downtime means lost leads.

Latency: The Speed of HTTP

Every time a Make.com scenario interacts with Google Sheets, it makes an external HTTP request. It must wait for authentication and for Google to parse the spreadsheet. This process gets slower the more cells you have.

Benchmark estimates:
Average Google Sheets “Search Row” operation: 400ms – 1.5 seconds.
Average Google Sheets “Add Row” operation: 600ms – 2 seconds.

If your AI agent needs to “remember” a conversation history by reading and writing to a sheet 10 times, you add 10 to 20 seconds of pure latency. For real-time applications, like an Inbound Potansiyel Müşteri Niteleyici, this delay is unacceptable.

The “Cell Limit” Paradox

Google allows up to 10 million cells, but performance degrades non-linearly as you approach it. A sheet with 100,000 rows is technically allowed. However, performing a search operation on it via API can time out before finding the data. You end up with a “zombie database”—technically alive, but unresponsive.

Thinkpeak.ai Solution: The Google Sheets Bulk Uploader

Do you need Google Sheets for reporting but hate the API limits? We developed the Google E-Tablolar Toplu Yükleyici to bypass these bottlenecks.

Instead of writing row-by-row, our utility buffers your data into a JSON array. It uploads thousands of rows in a single “Batch Update” operation. This reduces your API usage by 99%.

Explore Operations & Data Utilities


The “Silent Engine”: Make.com Data Store

The Make.com Data Store is a native, internal database built directly into the platform. It is not a spreadsheet. It is a flat, NoSQL-style storage system designed for machines, not humans. When you strip away the UI overhead, you gain raw performance.

Architecture and Speed

The Data Store lives on the same infrastructure as your scenarios. Therefore, there is zero network latency. There is no OAuth handshake, no external DNS resolution, and no HTTP overhead.

Benchmark estimates:
Average Data Store “Get Record” operation: < 50ms.
Average Data Store “Add/Update Record” operation: < 100ms.

Consider an AI Agent that needs to check “Have I posted this content yet?” before running a workflow. The Data Store provides an instantaneous “Yes/No” without slowing down the logic flow.

Capacity and Operations

The Data Store’s limitations are different from Google Sheets. They are defined by storage size and operation counts.

  • The Cost of Access: Every time you read or write, it consumes 1 Make Operation. This is identical to the “Module Cost” of Google Sheets, but you save on bandwidth and time.
  • Storage Limits: Standard plans tie storage to your operations tier. While this seems small, text data is incredibly lightweight. You can store tens of thousands of JSON records efficiently.

Data Structure: The Key-Value Advantage

Unlike Sheets, where data is unstructured cells, Data Stores force you to define a structure. This rigidity is a feature. It enforces data integrity. You cannot accidentally type an invalid date into a date field; the validation will reject it.

This makes Data Stores the superior choice for State Management. It tracks the status of an automation perfectly to prevent duplicate runs.


Head-to-Head Comparison: The Metrics That Matter

To help you choose the right architecture, we have broken down the comparison into four critical vectors: Speed, Scalability, Cost, and Human Utility.

1. Speed & Latency (The AI Requirement)

In the era of Generative AI, latency is the enemy. Large Language Models (LLMs) take time to generate tokens. Adding database latency on top creates a sluggish experience.

Özellik Google Sheets Make Data Store Winner
Read Latency 500ms – 2s 10ms – 100ms Data Store
Write Latency 1s – 3s 50ms – 100ms Data Store
Concurrency Fails > 60 req/min Handles parallel executions Data Store

Karar: If your workflow involves real-time user interaction, Google Sheets is too slow. Use a Data Store.

2. Scalability & Volume

How much data can you actually hold before the system breaks?

Özellik Google Sheets Make Data Store Winner
Record Limit ~100k rows (performant) Depends on Plan Size Google Sheets*
Search Ability Slow regex/query Fast indexed search Data Store
Data Integrity Low (Easy to delete cells) High (Strict Schema) Data Store

*Nuance: Google Sheets wins on raw volume for free users. You can dump 50,000 rows into a sheet for free. To store that much data in a Make Data Store, you might need to upgrade your plan. However, storing 50,000 rows in Sheets makes it useless for automation due to timeouts.

3. Cost & “Hidden” Taxes

Cost is not just the subscription price; it is the cost of maintenance and failure.

  • Google E-Tablolar: “Free” to start. The hidden tax is the engineering time required to build error handling to manage the 429 errors. Additionally, if a human breaks a sheet structure, your downtime costs money.
  • Make Data Store: Costs operations. If you have a high-frequency polling trigger checking the database every minute, you burn operations quickly.

Need a Cost-Efficient Architecture?

Wasting operations on inefficient database polling is why businesses overpay. We architect “Event-Driven” systems using Webhooks and optimized Data Stores that only consume operations when value is created.

See Our Bespoke Engineering Services


The AI Agent Context: Memory vs. Logs

In 2026, we are no longer just moving data from A to B. We are building Dijital Çalışanlar. These agents need memory. They need to know what they did five minutes ago and what they need to do next.

Short-Term Memory (Context)

For an AI agent, the Make Data Store is the perfect “Short-Term Memory.”

Örnek: An AI agent reviews your ad spend. It needs to store the ID of the ad it just analyzed so it doesn’t analyze it again 5 minutes later. The Data Store allows the agent to check the “Processed_Ads” store in milliseconds.

Long-Term Memory (Knowledge)

For storing historical knowledge, neither tool is ideal. Google Sheets is often used as a crude Knowledge Base because humans can curate it. However, for true AI Long-Term Memory, you should use Vector Databases like Pinecone or structured SQL databases. Google Sheets is difficult for an LLM to query semantically without hallucinating.


Hybrid Architectures: The “Thinkpeak Standard”

We rarely choose just one tool. We deploy a Hibrit Mimari that leverages the strengths of both systems while mitigating their weaknesses.

Pattern 1: The “High-Speed Sync”

Use the Make Data Store for the actual automation processing. Then, “dump” the data into Google Sheets once a day for human reporting.

  1. Tetikleyici: New Lead arrives.
  2. Süreç: Check Data Store for duplicates (Fast, Cheap).
  3. Eylem: If unique, process the lead and add to Data Store.
  4. Archive: Once every 24 hours, a scheduled scenario reads new records from the Data Store. It uses the Google E-Tablolar Toplu Yükleyici to push them to a spreadsheet for the Sales Manager.

This keeps the automation fast and the reporting visible, without hitting API limits.

Pattern 2: The “Config Loader”

Use Google Sheets as a “Configuration Panel” and Data Stores for execution.

  1. Setup: Create a Google Sheet to define variables like “Target Industry” or “Excluded Keywords.”
  2. Senkronize: A scenario runs every morning to read these settings and load them into a Make Data Store.
  3. Execution: The high-speed automation reads the settings from the Data Store during the day.

This allows non-technical staff to change the bot’s behavior by editing a spreadsheet. Meanwhile, the bot runs off the high-performance internal database.


When to Graduate: The “Limitless” Tier

There comes a point where both Google Sheets and Make Data Stores are insufficient. This usually happens when:

  1. You have >100,000 records.
  2. You need complex relational data (e.g., Customer has many Orders).
  3. You need strict security and role-based access control.

In this tier, we migrate clients to Supabase (PostgreSQL) veya Xano. These are true backend databases that offer REST APIs.

Why Upgrade?

  • SQL Power: You can run complex queries. For example, “Show me all users who joined last week AND spent >$500.” This is impossible in a Data Store and slow in Sheets.
  • Front-End Connectivity: Tools like Retool connect natively to SQL databases. You can build a consumer-grade mobile app on top of your data. This is not secure with a Google Sheet.

Ready to Build Your Own Software Stack?

If your business logic has outgrown spreadsheets, it’s time for Özel Düşük Kodlu Uygulama Geliştirme. We build fully functional SaaS MVPs and internal portals using robust SQL backends.

View Custom Development Services


Conclusion: The Verdict

The choice between Make.com Data Store and Google Sheets is not about which tool is “better.” It is about matching the tool to the lifecycle of your data.

  • Choose Google Sheets if: The data is for human eyes, the volume is low, and speed is not critical. It is the perfect UI for simple admin panels.
  • Choose Make Data Store if: The data is for the robot. You need high-speed state tracking, deduplication, and instant retrieval.
  • Choose Both if: You want the speed of the robot and the visibility of the human.

Automation is no longer just about connecting apps. It is about architecting self-driving ecosystems. If your setup is plagued by slow execution or timeouts, you are running a manual business in a digital wrapper.

Transform your static operations today. Whether you need a template to optimize your workflow or a bespoke application, Thinkpeak.ai is your partner in automation.

Browse the Automation Marketplace    Book a Bespoke Engineering Call


Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Can I visualize Make.com Data Store data?

Native visualization is very limited. Make provides a basic table view, but you cannot create charts or dashboards. If you need visualization, we recommend syncing the Data Store to Google Sheets, Looker Studio, or building a custom dashboard with Retool.

Does Make.com Data Store count against my Google API quota?

No. This is one of its biggest advantages. Operations performed on a Make Data Store are internal to Make. They do not touch Google’s servers, so you save your Google Sheets API quota for other tasks.

How do I backup my Make.com Data Store?

Unlike Google Sheets, Data Stores do not have a native “Undo” button. If a scenario deletes your data, it is gone. You should build a “Backup Scenario” that runs weekly to extract records and save them as a CSV.

Is Google Sheets secure enough for client data?

Google Sheets is secure at the infrastructure level, but risky at the access level. It is easy to accidentally share a sheet publicly. For sensitive PII or financial data, we strongly recommend using a secure SQL database or a Make Data Store with strict access controls.


Kaynaklar

Bir Yorum Bırakın

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir